Minnesota Statutes Annotated, 325 F.665
325F.665
New motor vehicle warranties; manufacturer's duty to repair, refund, or replace.
Subdivision one
Definitions.
For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them:
(a) "consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than for purposes of resale or sublease, of a brand spanking new motor vehicle used for personal, relatives, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, a person to whom the new motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes in the coursework of the period of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle;
(b) "manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business of manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who will, under normal business conditions in the coursework of the year, manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at least0 new motor vehicles;
(c) "manufacturer's express warranty" and "warranty" mean the written warranty of the manufacturer of a brand spanking new motor vehicle of its condition and fitness for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under that warranty;
(d) "lease" means a contract in the type of a lease or bailment for the use of personal property by a natural person for a timeframe exceeding months, used for personal, relatives, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, whether or not the lessee has the choice to buy or otherwise become the owner of the property at the expiration of the lease;
(e) "motor vehicle" means
(one) a passenger automobile as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 7, including pickup trucks and vans, and
(two) the self-propelled motor vehicle chassis or van portion of recreational equipment as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 25, which is sold or leased to a consumer in this state;
(f) "informal dispute settlement mechanism" means an arbitration process or procedure by which the manufacturer attempts to resolve disputes with consumers regarding motor vehicle nonconformities and repairs that arise in the coursework of the vehicle's warranty period;
(g) "motor vehicle lessor" means a who holds title to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who holds the lessor's rights under such agreement; and
(h) "early termination costs" means expenses and obligations incurred by a motor vehicle lessor due to an early termination of a written lease agreement and surrender of a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision four, including penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements.
Subdivision two
Manufacturer's duty to repair.
If a brand spanking new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer in the coursework of the term of the applicable express warranties or in the coursework of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make the repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of the warranty term or the two-year period.
Subdivision three
Manufacturer's duty to refund or replace.
(a) If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use or market value of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer & refund to the consumer the full purchase cost, including the cost of any options or other modifications arranged, installed, or made by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer within 30 days after the date of original delivery, & all other charges including, but not limited to, sales or excise tax, license fees & registration fees, reimbursement for towing & rental vehicle expenses incurred by the consumer because of the vehicle being out of service for warranty repair, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle not exceeding0 cents per mile driven or0 percent of the acquisition cost, whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement vehicle under this section, the consumer has the choice of rejecting the replacement vehicle & requiring the manufacturer to provide a refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer, & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the amount said by the dealer as the trade-in value of a consumer's used motor vehicle, and any additional amount paid by the consumer for the new motor vehicle. A manufacturer must give to the consumer an itemized statement listing each of the amounts refunded under this section. If the amount of sales or excise tax refunded is not separately said, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of public safety may refund the tax, as determined under paragraph (h), directly to the consumer & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to make use of by the consumer & any earlier consumer in the work of any period in which the use & market value of the motor vehicle are not substantially weakened. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this section
(one) that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially weaken the use or market value, or
(two) that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by somebody other than the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer.
(b) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties, if
(one) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair or more times by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable express warranty term or in the work of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but the nonconformity continues to exist, or
(two) the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of 30 or more business days in the work of the term or in the work of the period, whichever is the earlier date.
(c) If the nonconformity ends in a complete failure of the braking or steering technique of the new motor vehicle and is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven, it is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the nonconformity has been subject to repair at least one time by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable express warranty term or in the work of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, and the nonconformity continues to exist.
(d) The term of an applicable express warranty, the two-year period & the 30-day period shall be extended by any time period in the coursework of which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, or fire, floodwater, or other natural catastrophe.
(e) The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies against a manufacturer only if the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer has received prior written notification from or on behalf of the consumer at least one time & a chance to cure the defect alleged. If the notification is received by the manufacturer's agent or authorized dealer, the agent or dealer must forward it to the manufacturer by certified mail, return receipt requested.
(f) The expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b) does not bar a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement vehicle under paragraph (a) if the reasonable number of attempts to correct the nonconformity causing the substantial impairment occur within years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer in the coursework of the term of the applicable express warranty.
(g) At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must provide directly to the consumer a written statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT: IF THIS VEHICLE IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE STATE'S LEMON LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE OR YOUR LEASE PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED TO REFUND OR REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT, OR ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM IN WRITING AND GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO SUBMIT YOUR CASE TO THE CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE MANUFACTURER MUST OFFER IN MINNESOTA."
(h) The amount of the sales or excise tax to be paid by the manufacturer to the consumer under paragraph (a) shall be the tax paid by the consumer when the vehicle was bought less an amount equal to the tax paid multiplied by a fraction, the denominator of which is the acquisition cost of the vehicle and the numerator of which is the allowance deducted from the refund for the consumer's use of the vehicle.
Subdivision four
Manufacturer's duty to consumers with leased vehicles.
A consumer who leases a used motor vehicle has the same rights against the manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a used motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's leased vehicle pursuant to subdivision three, then the consumer lessee is not entitled to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled only to a refund as provided in this subdivision. In such a case, the consumer's leased vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer's written lease with the motor vehicle lessor must be terminated. The manufacturer shall then provide the consumer with a full refund of the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease, including all additional charges set forth in subdivision three, if actually paid by the consumer, less a reasonable allowance for use by the consumer as set forth in subdivision three. The manufacturer shall provide the motor vehicle lessor with a full refund of the vehicle's original purchase cost and any early termination costs, not to exceed 15 percent of the vehicle's original purchase cost, less the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease.
Subdivision five
Resale or re-lease of returned motor vehicle.
(a) If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision three or a similar statute of another state, whether as the result of a legal action or as the result of an casual dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased in this state unless:
(one) the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it provided to the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty require only last for 12,000 miles or 12 months after the date of resale, whichever is earlier; &
(two) the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT: THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT CURED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA LAW."
The provisions of this section apply to the resold or re-leased motor vehicle for full term of the warranty necessary under this subdivision.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a brand spanking new motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision three or a similar statute of another state because of a nonconformity leading to a complete failure of the braking or steering method of the motor vehicle likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle was driven, the motor vehicle may not be resold in this state.
Subdivision 6
Alternative dispute settlement mechanism.
(a) Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering in to franchise agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this state, or offering express warranties on its motor vehicles sold or distributed on the market in this state shall operate, or participate in, an casual dispute settlement mechanism located in the state of Minnesota which complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, part 703, & the requirements of this section. The provisions of subdivision three concerning refunds or replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not first used this mechanism before commencing a civil action, unless the manufacturer allows a consumer to commence an action without first using this mechanism.
(b) An casual dispute settlement mechanism provided for by this section shall, at the time a request for arbitration is made, provide to the consumer & to each that will arbitrate the consumer's dispute, knowledge about this section as approved & directed by the attorney general, in consultation with interested parties. The casual dispute settlement mechanism shall permit the parties to present or submit any arguments based on this section & shall not forbid or discourage the consideration of any such arguments.
(c) If, in an casual dispute settlement mechanism, it is decided that a consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund under subdivision three, then any refund or replacement offered by the manufacturer or chosen by a consumer shall include & itemize all amounts authorized by subdivision three. If the amount of excise tax refunded is not separately said, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of public safety may refund the excise tax, as determined under subdivision three, paragraph (h), directly to the consumer & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles.
(d) No documents shall be received by any casual dispute settlement mechanism unless those documents have been provided to each of the parties in the dispute at or prior to the mechanism's meeting, with a chance for the parties to comment on the documents either in writing or orally. If a consumer is present in the work of the casual dispute settlement mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request postponement of the mechanism's meeting to permit sufficient time to review any documents introduced at the time of the meeting which had not been introduced to the consumer prior to the meeting.
(e) The casual dispute settlement mechanism shall permit each party to appear & make an oral presentation in the state of Minnesota unless the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone or by phone, or unless the party fails to appear for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written notice. If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone, then manufacturer or dealer representatives may not participate in the discussion or decision of the dispute.
(f) Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended specifications for the vehicle by having the basis of the manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical professional selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the casual dispute settlement hearing.
(g) Where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair a consumer's vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the casual dispute mechanism from the consumer as to whether the repairs were successfully done, the parties must be given the chance to present any additional knowledge regarding the manufacturer's recent repair attempt before any final decision is rendered by the casual dispute settlement mechanism. This provision shall not prejudice a consumer's rights under this section.
(h) If the manufacturer knows that a technical service bulletin directly applies to the specific mechanical issue being disputed by the consumer, then the manufacturer shall provide the technical service bulletin to the consumer at reasonable cost. The mechanism shall review any such technical service bulletins submitted by either party.
(i) A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section, but the fee may not exceed the conciliation court filing fee in the county where the arbitration is conducted.
(j) Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented by an attorney in an casual dispute settlement mechanism.
(k) The casual dispute settlement mechanism has all the evidence-gathering powers granted an arbitrator under section 572.14.
(l) A choice issued in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section may be in writing and signed.
Subdivision 7
Effect & admissibility of decision by casual dispute settlement mechanism.
The decision issued in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section is non-binding on the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Any party, on application, may remove the decision to district court for a trial de novo. If the manufacturer is aggrieved by the decision of the casual dispute settlement mechanism, an application to remove the decision must be filed in the district court within 30 days after the date the decision is received by the parties. If the application to remove is not made within 30 days, then the district court shall, on application of a party, issue an order confirming the decision. A written decision issued by an casual dispute settlement mechanism, & any written findings on which the decision is based, are admissible as non-binding proof in any later legal action & are not subject to further foundation requirements.
Subdivision 8
Treble damages for bad faith appeal of decision.
If the district court finds that a party has removed a choice of an casual dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous & pricey to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position solely to delay recovery by the other party, then the court shall award to the prevailing party times the actual damages sustained, together with costs & disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees.
Subdivision 9
Civil treatment.
Any consumer injured by a violation of this section may bring a civil action to enforce this section & recover costs & disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the civil action. In addition to the treatments provided herein, the attorney general may bring an action pursuant to section 8.31 against any manufacturer for violation of this section.
Subdivision ten
Limitation on actions.
A civil action brought under this section must be commenced within years of the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer; except that, if the consumer applies to an casual dispute settlement mechanism within years of the date of original delivery of a new motor vehicle to a consumer, and if the consumer is aggrieved by the decision of the casual dispute settlement mechanism, then any civil action brought under this section must be commenced within six months after the date of the final decision by the mechanism.
Subdivision 11
Treatment nonexclusive.
Nothing in this section limits the rights or cures which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.
Subdivision 12
Disclosure requirement.
In addition to any investigative powers authorized by law, the attorney general may inspect the records of the casual dispute settlement mechanism on reasonable notice, in the work of regular business hours, and may make available to the public knowledge about the operation of the mechanism, but knowledge on an individual may not be disclosed without the prior consent of the individual.
Subdivision 13
Dealer liability.
Nothing in this section imposes liability on a dealer or creates an additional cause of action by a consumer against a dealer, except for written express warranties made by the dealer apart from the manufacturer's warranties. The manufacturer shall not charge back or need reimbursement by the dealer for any costs, including, but not limited to, any refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this section, unless there is proof that the related repairs had not been carried out by the dealer in a timely manner or in a manner substantially consistent with the manufacturer's published instructions.
325F.665
New motor vehicle warranties; manufacturer's duty to repair, refund, or replace.
Subdivision one
Definitions.
For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them:
(a) "consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than for purposes of resale or sublease, of a brand spanking new motor vehicle used for personal, relatives, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, a person to whom the new motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes in the coursework of the period of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle;
(b) "manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business of manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who will, under normal business conditions in the coursework of the year, manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at least0 new motor vehicles;
(c) "manufacturer's express warranty" and "warranty" mean the written warranty of the manufacturer of a brand spanking new motor vehicle of its condition and fitness for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under that warranty;
(d) "lease" means a contract in the type of a lease or bailment for the use of personal property by a natural person for a timeframe exceeding months, used for personal, relatives, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, whether or not the lessee has the choice to buy or otherwise become the owner of the property at the expiration of the lease;
(e) "motor vehicle" means
(one) a passenger automobile as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 7, including pickup trucks and vans, and
(two) the self-propelled motor vehicle chassis or van portion of recreational equipment as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 25, which is sold or leased to a consumer in this state;
(f) "informal dispute settlement mechanism" means an arbitration process or procedure by which the manufacturer attempts to resolve disputes with consumers regarding motor vehicle nonconformities and repairs that arise in the coursework of the vehicle's warranty period;
(g) "motor vehicle lessor" means a who holds title to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who holds the lessor's rights under such agreement; and
(h) "early termination costs" means expenses and obligations incurred by a motor vehicle lessor due to an early termination of a written lease agreement and surrender of a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision four, including penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements.
Subdivision two
Manufacturer's duty to repair.
If a brand spanking new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer in the coursework of the term of the applicable express warranties or in the coursework of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make the repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of the warranty term or the two-year period.
Subdivision three
Manufacturer's duty to refund or replace.
(a) If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use or market value of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer & refund to the consumer the full purchase cost, including the cost of any options or other modifications arranged, installed, or made by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer within 30 days after the date of original delivery, & all other charges including, but not limited to, sales or excise tax, license fees & registration fees, reimbursement for towing & rental vehicle expenses incurred by the consumer because of the vehicle being out of service for warranty repair, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle not exceeding0 cents per mile driven or0 percent of the acquisition cost, whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement vehicle under this section, the consumer has the choice of rejecting the replacement vehicle & requiring the manufacturer to provide a refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer, & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the amount said by the dealer as the trade-in value of a consumer's used motor vehicle, and any additional amount paid by the consumer for the new motor vehicle. A manufacturer must give to the consumer an itemized statement listing each of the amounts refunded under this section. If the amount of sales or excise tax refunded is not separately said, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of public safety may refund the tax, as determined under paragraph (h), directly to the consumer & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to make use of by the consumer & any earlier consumer in the work of any period in which the use & market value of the motor vehicle are not substantially weakened. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this section
(one) that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially weaken the use or market value, or
(two) that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by somebody other than the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer.
(b) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties, if
(one) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair or more times by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable express warranty term or in the work of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but the nonconformity continues to exist, or
(two) the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of 30 or more business days in the work of the term or in the work of the period, whichever is the earlier date.
(c) If the nonconformity ends in a complete failure of the braking or steering technique of the new motor vehicle and is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven, it is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the nonconformity has been subject to repair at least one time by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable express warranty term or in the work of the period of years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, and the nonconformity continues to exist.
(d) The term of an applicable express warranty, the two-year period & the 30-day period shall be extended by any time period in the coursework of which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, or fire, floodwater, or other natural catastrophe.
(e) The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies against a manufacturer only if the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer has received prior written notification from or on behalf of the consumer at least one time & a chance to cure the defect alleged. If the notification is received by the manufacturer's agent or authorized dealer, the agent or dealer must forward it to the manufacturer by certified mail, return receipt requested.
(f) The expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b) does not bar a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement vehicle under paragraph (a) if the reasonable number of attempts to correct the nonconformity causing the substantial impairment occur within years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer in the coursework of the term of the applicable express warranty.
(g) At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must provide directly to the consumer a written statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT: IF THIS VEHICLE IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE STATE'S LEMON LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE OR YOUR LEASE PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED TO REFUND OR REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT, OR ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM IN WRITING AND GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO SUBMIT YOUR CASE TO THE CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE MANUFACTURER MUST OFFER IN MINNESOTA."
(h) The amount of the sales or excise tax to be paid by the manufacturer to the consumer under paragraph (a) shall be the tax paid by the consumer when the vehicle was bought less an amount equal to the tax paid multiplied by a fraction, the denominator of which is the acquisition cost of the vehicle and the numerator of which is the allowance deducted from the refund for the consumer's use of the vehicle.
Subdivision four
Manufacturer's duty to consumers with leased vehicles.
A consumer who leases a used motor vehicle has the same rights against the manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a used motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's leased vehicle pursuant to subdivision three, then the consumer lessee is not entitled to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled only to a refund as provided in this subdivision. In such a case, the consumer's leased vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer's written lease with the motor vehicle lessor must be terminated. The manufacturer shall then provide the consumer with a full refund of the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease, including all additional charges set forth in subdivision three, if actually paid by the consumer, less a reasonable allowance for use by the consumer as set forth in subdivision three. The manufacturer shall provide the motor vehicle lessor with a full refund of the vehicle's original purchase cost and any early termination costs, not to exceed 15 percent of the vehicle's original purchase cost, less the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease.
Subdivision five
Resale or re-lease of returned motor vehicle.
(a) If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision three or a similar statute of another state, whether as the result of a legal action or as the result of an casual dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased in this state unless:
(one) the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it provided to the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty require only last for 12,000 miles or 12 months after the date of resale, whichever is earlier; &
(two) the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT: THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT CURED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA LAW."
The provisions of this section apply to the resold or re-leased motor vehicle for full term of the warranty necessary under this subdivision.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a brand spanking new motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision three or a similar statute of another state because of a nonconformity leading to a complete failure of the braking or steering method of the motor vehicle likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle was driven, the motor vehicle may not be resold in this state.
Subdivision 6
Alternative dispute settlement mechanism.
(a) Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering in to franchise agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this state, or offering express warranties on its motor vehicles sold or distributed on the market in this state shall operate, or participate in, an casual dispute settlement mechanism located in the state of Minnesota which complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, part 703, & the requirements of this section. The provisions of subdivision three concerning refunds or replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not first used this mechanism before commencing a civil action, unless the manufacturer allows a consumer to commence an action without first using this mechanism.
(b) An casual dispute settlement mechanism provided for by this section shall, at the time a request for arbitration is made, provide to the consumer & to each that will arbitrate the consumer's dispute, knowledge about this section as approved & directed by the attorney general, in consultation with interested parties. The casual dispute settlement mechanism shall permit the parties to present or submit any arguments based on this section & shall not forbid or discourage the consideration of any such arguments.
(c) If, in an casual dispute settlement mechanism, it is decided that a consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund under subdivision three, then any refund or replacement offered by the manufacturer or chosen by a consumer shall include & itemize all amounts authorized by subdivision three. If the amount of excise tax refunded is not separately said, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of public safety may refund the excise tax, as determined under subdivision three, paragraph (h), directly to the consumer & lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor vehicles.
(d) No documents shall be received by any casual dispute settlement mechanism unless those documents have been provided to each of the parties in the dispute at or prior to the mechanism's meeting, with a chance for the parties to comment on the documents either in writing or orally. If a consumer is present in the work of the casual dispute settlement mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request postponement of the mechanism's meeting to permit sufficient time to review any documents introduced at the time of the meeting which had not been introduced to the consumer prior to the meeting.
(e) The casual dispute settlement mechanism shall permit each party to appear & make an oral presentation in the state of Minnesota unless the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone or by phone, or unless the party fails to appear for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written notice. If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone, then manufacturer or dealer representatives may not participate in the discussion or decision of the dispute.
(f) Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended specifications for the vehicle by having the basis of the manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical professional selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the casual dispute settlement hearing.
(g) Where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair a consumer's vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the casual dispute mechanism from the consumer as to whether the repairs were successfully done, the parties must be given the chance to present any additional knowledge regarding the manufacturer's recent repair attempt before any final decision is rendered by the casual dispute settlement mechanism. This provision shall not prejudice a consumer's rights under this section.
(h) If the manufacturer knows that a technical service bulletin directly applies to the specific mechanical issue being disputed by the consumer, then the manufacturer shall provide the technical service bulletin to the consumer at reasonable cost. The mechanism shall review any such technical service bulletins submitted by either party.
(i) A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section, but the fee may not exceed the conciliation court filing fee in the county where the arbitration is conducted.
(j) Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented by an attorney in an casual dispute settlement mechanism.
(k) The casual dispute settlement mechanism has all the evidence-gathering powers granted an arbitrator under section 572.14.
(l) A choice issued in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section may be in writing and signed.
Subdivision 7
Effect & admissibility of decision by casual dispute settlement mechanism.
The decision issued in an casual dispute settlement mechanism necessary by this section is non-binding on the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Any party, on application, may remove the decision to district court for a trial de novo. If the manufacturer is aggrieved by the decision of the casual dispute settlement mechanism, an application to remove the decision must be filed in the district court within 30 days after the date the decision is received by the parties. If the application to remove is not made within 30 days, then the district court shall, on application of a party, issue an order confirming the decision. A written decision issued by an casual dispute settlement mechanism, & any written findings on which the decision is based, are admissible as non-binding proof in any later legal action & are not subject to further foundation requirements.
Subdivision 8
Treble damages for bad faith appeal of decision.
If the district court finds that a party has removed a choice of an casual dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous & pricey to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position solely to delay recovery by the other party, then the court shall award to the prevailing party times the actual damages sustained, together with costs & disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees.
Subdivision 9
Civil treatment.
Any consumer injured by a violation of this section may bring a civil action to enforce this section & recover costs & disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the civil action. In addition to the treatments provided herein, the attorney general may bring an action pursuant to section 8.31 against any manufacturer for violation of this section.
Subdivision ten
Limitation on actions.
A civil action brought under this section must be commenced within years of the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer; except that, if the consumer applies to an casual dispute settlement mechanism within years of the date of original delivery of a new motor vehicle to a consumer, and if the consumer is aggrieved by the decision of the casual dispute settlement mechanism, then any civil action brought under this section must be commenced within six months after the date of the final decision by the mechanism.
Subdivision 11
Treatment nonexclusive.
Nothing in this section limits the rights or cures which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.
Subdivision 12
Disclosure requirement.
In addition to any investigative powers authorized by law, the attorney general may inspect the records of the casual dispute settlement mechanism on reasonable notice, in the work of regular business hours, and may make available to the public knowledge about the operation of the mechanism, but knowledge on an individual may not be disclosed without the prior consent of the individual.
Subdivision 13
Dealer liability.
Nothing in this section imposes liability on a dealer or creates an additional cause of action by a consumer against a dealer, except for written express warranties made by the dealer apart from the manufacturer's warranties. The manufacturer shall not charge back or need reimbursement by the dealer for any costs, including, but not limited to, any refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this section, unless there is proof that the related repairs had not been carried out by the dealer in a timely manner or in a manner substantially consistent with the manufacturer's published instructions.